What does Thoreau comment about Legislators?
Civil Disobedience is a notable literary work by Henry David Thoreau. A complete discussion of this literary work is given, which will help you enhance your literary skills and prepare for the exam. Read the Main texts, Key info, Summary, Themes, Characters, Literary devices, Quotations, Notes, to various questions of Civil Disobedience.
Answer
Question: What does Thoreau comment about Legislators?
In “Civil Disobedience” (1849), Thoreau (1817-62) offers harsh criticisms of legislators and their abilities. He believes that legislators lack the wisdom, talent, and moral clarity necessary to address the pressing issues of their time. Here are points highlighting Thoreau’s comments about legislators:
Absence of True Leadership: Thoreau argues that true leaders capable of settling important societal issues are rare. He suggests that orators, politicians, and individuals may abound, but genuine leaders who can offer meaningful solutions are inadequate. Thoreau writes,
“No man with a genius for legislation has appeared in America. They are rare in the history of the world.”
This indicates his doubt regarding the quality of leadership in legislative bodies.
Limited Understanding of Taxation and Finance: Thoreau criticizes legislators for their lack of understanding of crucial matters such as taxation, finance, commerce, and agriculture. He believes that they prioritize eloquence over practical wisdom. This leads to a decay of essential areas of governance. Thoreau states,
“Our legislators have not yet learned the comparative value of free trade and of freedom, of union, and of rectitude, to a nation.”
This highlights his perception of their inadequate grasp of fundamental economic and social principles.
Focus on Oratory and Eloquence: Thoreau observes that legislators tend to prioritize eloquence and oratory over genuine insight and practical talent. He contends that while eloquent speeches may inspire, they often lack substance. Thoreau states,
“We love eloquence for its own sake, and not for any truth that it may utter, or any heroism it may inspire.”
Failure to Embrace Change: Thoreau implies that legislators are resistant to change and innovation, preferring to adhere to traditional practices and beliefs. He criticizes their reluctance to challenge existing norms and institutions, even when they perpetuate injustice. This suggests his frustration with their adherence to outdated modes of thinking.
In conclusion, Thoreau’s comments about legislators in “Civil Disobedience” reveal his doubt regarding their leadership abilities, understanding of key issues, reliance on rhetoric over substance, and resistance to change. He advocates for a more enlightened and visionary approach to governance.