Distinguish between a scholar and a bookworm
The American Scholar is a notable literary work by Ralph Waldo Emerson. A complete discussion of this literary work is given, which will help you enhance your literary skills and prepare for the exam. Read the Main texts, Key info, Summary, Themes, Characters, Literary devices, Quotations, Notes, to various questions of The American Scholar.
Answer
Question: Distinguish between a scholar and a bookworm.
Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-82) composes the iconic essay “The American Scholar” (1837). A scholar and a bookworm may seem similar at first glance. Both of them engage with books and learning. However, there are significant differences between the two. A bookworm simply consumes knowledge without much reflection or application. On the other hand, a scholar goes beyond mere consumption. He actively engages with ideas, critically analyzes them, and contributes to knowledge in meaningful ways.
Engagement with Life: A scholar actively participates in life. He draws inspiration and knowledge from various experiences. On the other hand, a bookworm merely indulges in passive reading. Emerson emphasizes the scholar’s engagement in real-life situations. It contrasts with the bookworm’s isolated pursuit of knowledge within the pages of books.
Application of Knowledge: A scholar seeks to apply knowledge to practical situations. A bookworm often collects information without understanding its relevance to the world around them. Emerson states,
“But the final value of action, like that of books, and better than books, is, that it is a resource.”
This distinction highlights the scholar’s active engagement with life. He uses knowledge as a tool for action and improvement.
Independence of Thought: A scholar exercises independent thinking and critical analysis. A bookworm may passively accept information without questioning or reflection. Emerson highlights the scholar’s self-reliance, stating,
“He and he only knows the world… Let him not quit his belief.”
Here, he encourages scholars to trust their own insights and convictions. He forbade him from serving popular opinions or authority.
Impact on Society: Ultimately, a scholar’s search for knowledge should benefit society by sharing wisdom and inspiring positive change. In contrast, a bookworm’s isolated pursuit of information may not have a meaningful impact on the world. Emerson highlights the scholar’s role in elevating society through the spreading of knowledge and inspiration. Emerson asserts,
“He is the world’s eye. He is the world’s heart”.
In conclusion, Emerson shows the role of a scholar who actively engages with life. In contrast, a bookworm passively consumes information without necessarily contributing to society’s betterment.