How does Eliot distinguish between the intellectual poets and the reflective poets?

Answer

How does Eliot distinguish between the intellectual poets and the reflective poets? Whom does he prefer, and why?

In his famous essay “The Metaphysical Poets” (1921), T.S. Eliot (1888-1965) explains how there are two kinds of poets: intellectual poets and reflective poets. Eliot makes a clear distinction between these two groups. He prefers intellectual poets, especially those from the 17th century, like John Donne (1572-1631) and George Herbert (1593 – 1633). He praises them for their ability to combine thought and emotion in a way that reflective poets like Tennyson (1809-92) and Browning (1812-89) struggle to achieve. 

The Intellectual Poets Unite Thought and Emotion: Eliot praises the intellectual poets. He especially praises metaphysical poets like John Donne for their ability to combine thought and emotion. He says, 

“A thought to Donne was an experience; it modified his sensibility.” 

For Donne and other intellectual poets, thinking is not separate from feeling; their thoughts are deeply felt, just like emotions. Eliot sees this as a sign of great poetry because it shows how closely connected their minds and hearts are. He believes that this unity makes their poetry more powerful and true to life.

Reflective Poets Separate Thought and Emotion: In contrast, Eliot criticizes the reflective poets, such as Tennyson and Browning. They divide thought and feeling. He says about these poets, 

“They do not feel their thought as immediately as the odour of a rose.” 

For Eliot, this separation weakens their poetry because it lacks a deep connection between intellect and emotion. Reflective poets think deeply but do not fully feel what they think. This leads to poetry that feels detached from genuine emotion.

Intellectual Poets Combine Different Ideas Together: Eliot praises intellectual poets for their ability to combine different and often unrelated experiences together in a unique way. He says, 

“The poets of the seventeenth century… possessed a mechanism of sensibility which could devour any kind of experience.” 

This means that they could bring