Comment on F. R. Leavis’ prose style from your reading of the essay Literature and Society

Answer

Question: Comment on F. R. Leavis’ prose style from your reading of the essay “Literature and Society.”

In Frank Raymond Leavis’ (1895-1978) essay “Literature and Society” (1937), his prose style is characterized by clarity, accuracy, and a convincing tone. Leavis employs straightforward language to convey complex ideas. It makes his arguments accessible to readers of various backgrounds. Here are key points regarding Leavis’ prose style from the essay:

Clearness and Directness: Leavis’ writing is marked by its clearness and directness. He enables readers to grasp his arguments easily. He avoids unnecessary vocabulary or complex syntax. He uses straightforward expression. For example, he states, 

“I should have been braced for such challenges as the proposition that D.H. Lawrence… saw those forces from a bourgeois viewpoint,” 

Convincing Tone: Leavis adopts a convincing tone throughout the essay. He seeks to convince readers of the validity of his ideas. He presents his arguments with confidence and trust. He uses decorated strategies to engage and convince the audience. For instance, he asserts, 

“Without the individual talent there is no creation.”

Effective Use of Examples: Leavis effectively employs examples from literary history to illustrate his points and support his arguments. He references well-known writers and works to support his claims. It helps readers to contextualize his ideas within the broader framework of literary scholarship. As he discusses the Neoclassical tradition, he cites, 

“The characteristic movements and dictions of the eighteenth century, in verse as well as prose, convey a suggestion of social deportment and company manners.”

Balanced Structure: Leavis’ essay demonstrates a balanced structure, with clear organization and progression of ideas. He introduces each point methodically. It builds upon previous arguments and leads the reader towards his conclusions. This structured approach enhances the coherence and readability of his prose. He maintains a cohesive flow of thought as he transitions between discussing literary traditions and their importance.

Engagement with Counterarguments: Leavis engages with counterarguments thoughtfully. He acknowledges opposing viewpoints before refuting them with evidence and reasoning. He demonstrates a willingness to consider alternative perspectives while ultimately defending his own stance. For example, he acknowledges conflicting interpretations of literary traditions, stating, 

“The Romantic attitude didn’t…but it allows for the individual aspect more than the Marxist does.”

Accessible Language: Throughout the essay, Leavis uses language that is accessible to a wide audience. He avoids overly technical or academic terms. He communicates his ideas using vocabulary and syntax that are straightforward and easy to understand. He ensures that readers of varying levels of familiarity with literary theory can understand his arguments. This accessibility enhances the essay’s effectiveness in reaching and engaging its audience.

In conclusion, Frank Raymond Leavis’ prose style in “Literature and Society” is characterized by clarity and accessible language. Through his skilful use of language, Leavis invites readers to understand the complex relationship between literature and society. This makes his essay a clear and thought-provoking read for audiences of all backgrounds.