Speech on the East India Bill is a notable literary work by Edmund Burke. A complete discussion of this literary work is given, which will help you enhance your literary skills and prepare for the exam. Read the Main texts, Key info, Summary, Themes, Characters, Literary devices, Quotations, Notes, to various questions of Speech on the East India Bill.
Mention the four objections raised by the bill against the charter of the East India Company.
Edmund Burke, an influential statesman and orator (1729-1797), made a notable speech on December 1, 1783, titled “Speech on East India Bill.” He addressed the bill that challenged the charter of the East India Company. In this speech, he laid out four primary objections raised by the bill against the charter of the East India Company.
An Attack on the Chartered Rights of Men: The first objection centered on the notion of “the chartered rights of men.” Burke described it as “full of affectation” and “very unusual.” He argued that the East India Company’s charter was unlike the Magna Carta. It was designed to establish monopoly and political power rather than restrain and destroy monopoly.
Increasing the Crown’s Power: The second objection was that the bill would increase the influence of the Crown. Critics feared that by transferring the patronage of India to a commission nominated by Parliament and independent of the Crown, the bill would inadvertently expand royal authority.
Reducing the Crown’s Influence: Conversely, the third objection claimed that the bill did not increase, but rather diminished, the influence of the Crown, It indicates that the bill promoted the interests of certain ministers and their party.
Degradation of National Credit: The fourth and final objection concerned the potential impact on national credit. Burke upholds the existing financial mismanagement by the East India Company. He asserts that it had already adversely affected the sinking fund. He implied that reform was necessary to prevent further financial deterioration.
In conclusion, Burke’s arguments in his speech were aimed at demonstrating that the bill was a necessary measure to rectify the abuses of power and mismanagement by the East India Company. He highlighted the importance of ethical governance and the protection of both British and Indian interests.