How Does Dr Johnson Compare Cowley and Milton as Poets?

Answer

How does Johnson compare Cowley and Milton as poets?

Samuel Johnson (1709-1784) compares Abraham Cowley (1618-1667) and John Milton (1608-1674) as two great poets of their time. Both wrote Latin poetry and were skilled, but their styles and principles differed. Johnson highlights their strengths and weaknesses. He also shows how Cowley’s wit and learning contrasted with Milton’s grandeur and discipline. 

Latin Poetry Skills: Johnson notes that both Cowley and Milton excelled in Latin poetry. Cowley adapted Roman diction to his ideas. Milton, however, stuck closely to ancient language and thoughts. Johnson believes Cowley’s approach was more original, while Milton’s was more traditional. Both were talented, but Cowley’s creativity stood out.

Style and Themes: Cowley’s poetry was full of wit and clever ideas, often complex. Milton’s work was more serious and grand. They focused on deep themes like religion and morality. Johnson says Cowley’s style was lively but sometimes confusing. Milton’s style was powerful and precise.

Use of Metaphors: Cowley used many metaphors and conceits. These elements made his poems imaginative but hard to follow. Milton’s metaphors were simpler and stronger. Johnson praises Milton for his natural and effective imagery, while Cowley’s often seemed forced or unnatural.

Impact and Legacy: Johnson says Milton’s work had a greater effect because of its depth and universal appeal. Cowley’s poetry, though clever, was less influential over time. Milton’s “Paradise Lost” (1667) became a classic, while Cowley’s fame faded. 

In summary, Johnson compares Cowley and Milton as talented but different poets. Cowley was witty and creative, while Milton was profound and disciplined. Milton’s work aged better. Cowley’s cleverness was admired but not as enduring. Johnson’s analysis shows how their styles and choices shaped their legacies.