Why does Thoreau say that the rich are less likely to practice civil disobedience?

Answer

Question: Why does Thoreau say that the rich are less likely to practice civil disobedience?

In his essay “Civil Disobedience” (1849), Henry David Thoreau (1817-62) discusses the role of wealth in relation to civil disobedience. He highlights how affluence can influence an individual’s willingness to resist unjust laws. Thoreau argues that the rich are less likely to engage in acts of civil disobedience due to several factors:

Dependency on the System: Thoreau suggests that wealthy individuals are often dependent on the existing system for their prosperity. This makes them hesitant to challenge it. This dependence on the institution that fosters their wealth discourages them from questioning or opposing it. He writes, 

“But the rich man—not to make any invidious comparison—is always sold to the institution which makes him rich”. 

Comfort and Convenience: Thoreau observes that the wealthy are less willing to disrupt their comfortable lifestyles by engaging in acts of civil disobedience. The pursuit of wealth often leads to a narrowing of life’s opportunities. It makes individuals less willing to risk their comfort by challenging the state.

Materialism: Thoreau suggests that the pursuit of wealth can reduce an individual’s moral virtue and sense of justice. He argues, 

“Absolutely speaking, the more money, the less virtue; for money comes between a man and his objects”. 

The collection of wealth can lead to a prioritization of material possessions over ethical principles.

Fear of Losing Ownership: Thoreau implies that the wealthy fear losing their ownership and social status if they engage in acts of civil disobedience. The fear of retribution from the state, such as loss of property or social standing, often prevents the wealthy from challenging its authority.

In conclusion, Thoreau suggests that the rich are less likely to practice civil disobedience due to their dependency on the system and fear of losing ownership. These factors contribute to their reluctance to challenge unjust laws and institutions.